Lesson Plan - Debate: Should We Send Astronauts to Mars?

Learning Objective

Students will evaluate the reasons and evidence used to support each side of a debate about Mars exploration.

Text Structure

Argument

Content-Area Connections

Space Science; Debate

Standards Correlations

CCSS: RI.3.1, RI.3.2, RI.3.3, RI.3.4, RI.3.5, RI.3.6, RI.3.7, RI.3.8, RI.3.10, L.3.4, SL.3.1

NCSS: Science, Technology, and Society

TEKS: Social Studies 3.8

1. Preparing to Read

Watch a Video: Mission to Mars
Ask: What might future astronauts experience on a mission to Mars?

Preview Words to Know
Project the online vocabulary slideshow and introduce the Words to Know.

  • desolate 
  • radiation


Set a Purpose for Reading
As students read, have them underline key arguments on both sides.

2. Close-Reading Questions

1. What is the purpose of sending Perseverance to Mars?
Scientists are using Perseverance to explore Mars and collect samples of rocks. NASA hopes that one day the first astronauts to visit Mars will bring those samples back to Earth to be studied.
(RI.3.1 TEXT EVIDENCE)

2. Why does scientist Jim Rice argue that humans are better explorers than robots are?
Jim Rice argues that humans are better and faster explorers than robots because humans can make decisions. Rice says, “Robots depend on humans to tell them what to do.”
(RI.3.6 POINT OF VIEW)

3. Based on the “no” argument, what dangers would astronauts face on Mars?
Astronauts would be too far from Earth to get food deliveries or to be rescued if something were to go wrong. The astronauts would also have to worry about deadly radiation from the sun.
(RI.3.2 KEY DETAILS)

3. Skill Building

FEATURED SKILL: Opinion Writing
Use “Ready, Set, Debate!” to have students prepare for a debate on sending astronauts to Mars. This Skill Builder is available as Google Slides or a PDF.
(SL.3.1 COLLABORATIVE DISCUSSIONS)

Text-to-Speech